Glen-L.com

The Boatbuilder Connection
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 11:10 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:36 am
Posts: 74
Location: Muskego, WI
Reading through many of the posts here, I'm finding just as many opinions. So....can stainless screws and/or ring shank nails be used as a reasonable substitute for silicon bronze???. Since many fasteners are removed anyways, I would think this would avoid any risks that stainless may or may not cause is the long run (ie. rusting out from the inside, deteriorating in the absence of O2 in the case of encapsulation..etc, etc). One of the only problems that I see consistently through the majority of the postings is the brittle nature of stainless.

Thanks, Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:21 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: tarpon springs fl
I'm not getting into this one ,but to clarify one thing: the ring shank nails you use are bronze & you CAN'T remove them after they are driven in place....the heads have pulled off when I tried.

_________________
Boat building can best be defined as an endless series of
tragedies obscured by the occasional miracle, followed by a good bottle of beer.

Don't Dream Your Life, Live Your Dream


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Nails
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:36 am
Posts: 74
Location: Muskego, WI
I understand that about the nails. I have no intention to remove them. I was just lumping them in with my other question about stainless vs silicon bronze.

Thanks, Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:20 pm
Posts: 305
Location: Cape May, NJ & 1000 Islands, NY
Do not think that stainless steel fasteners are brittle.
Stainless by nature is a soft and gummy material.
This is why it is not the easiest material to machine.

_________________
If you don't build it now, You will regret it later!

Crackerbox Build:
http://s232.photobucket.com/albums/ee255/jtpatronimfg/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:19 pm
Posts: 496
Location: Marin California
It's a no brainer, stainless is only good as stainless when it is exposed to the
air. I can't go into the science of it but once it is in an airless environment it loses its stainless property and can rust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2003 5:19 am
Posts: 3119
Location: Nashville, Tn.
Oh man, now I'm really confused. I thought that for an iron based metal to rust, it had to come into contact with water AND oxygen. So in order to inhibit this process, one would try and inhibit the reaction of the iron to either air or moisture. I'm rambling a little here but bear with me.

Since we can't guarrantee that our iron based metal will always be used in an environment free of air and moisture, we would start creating alloys that would inhibit the reactions that would start the rust cycle. The way we do this is by injecting chromium into the mix. ....hence stainless steel. Now I fully understand that stainless steel can rust given the right circumstances, but it IS resitant to rust because of the chromium. Also, doesn't stainless steel develop a "passivation" layer that would hinder further oxidation? Ergo, it LOOKS like it's rusting when in fact, it only develops the appearance of rust on the outside?

Seriously, I'm just asking here NOT arguing. I really don't know.

_________________
Isn't it amazing!! The person that never has the fortitude to pursue his own dreams, will be the first to try and discourage you from pursuing yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:21 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: tarpon springs fl
Dave,

I don't know either,but on my last TNT build in 1985,before the forum & I didn't know any better,I used stainless on my build.

The boat was encapsulated,& used in saltwater most of it's life.

I never noticed any evidence of rusting of the screws(bulging,or stains,etc),but if they disintegrated,the epoxy did a great job of holding the boat together anyway.

I only gave the boat away after I discovered rot in the bottom ply near the transom& in the transom itself due to letting the boat sit uncovered outside with rainwater in it & the transom top exposed. :oops: :cry:

I never saw any problem with the stainless fasteners though(and I'm not saying there wasn't a problem there,just saying no evidence)

Believe me I kicked my own butt for being a neglectful jerk on this!!! :x

_________________
Boat building can best be defined as an endless series of
tragedies obscured by the occasional miracle, followed by a good bottle of beer.

Don't Dream Your Life, Live Your Dream


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:20 pm
Posts: 305
Location: Cape May, NJ & 1000 Islands, NY
In basic 300 series stainless steel does not rust. (Low carbon content)
400 series stainless is a commercial grade and a higher
content of carbon. If left in constant contact with moisture
it will show signs of rusting. If wiped dry it will rsist rust.

Until joining this forum I had never heard of stainless oxidizing
in a oxygen free environment. It was always my understanding
that it was the introduction of oxygen which contains moisture that
causes the oxidation.

I will have to go back into my metallurgy books and see if I can find more info. Interesting situation! :o :?

_________________
If you don't build it now, You will regret it later!

Crackerbox Build:
http://s232.photobucket.com/albums/ee255/jtpatronimfg/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:45 am
Posts: 5995
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA
Stainless is affected by Chlorides (salt) and will corrode. A304 is more subject to chloride corrosion and A316. Stainless is very close to aluminum galvanically. It will go away faster than carbon steel in a salt environment with steel.

Scary isn't it!

Bill

_________________
Mini -Tug, KH Tahoe 19 & Bartender 24 - There can be no miracle recoveries without first screwing up.
Tahoe 19 Build


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:20 pm
Posts: 305
Location: Cape May, NJ & 1000 Islands, NY
That is very interesting info Bill. I was a damage controlman in the Coast Guard and we used quite a bit of 304 on exterior parts of the ship.
All the water tight hatch combings were fabed from formed 304 angle.

Is this info that has been recognized in the last 25 years or so?

_________________
If you don't build it now, You will regret it later!

Crackerbox Build:
http://s232.photobucket.com/albums/ee255/jtpatronimfg/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:45 am
Posts: 5995
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA
The A304 vs A316 definitely has been around. A big difference maybe keeping it washed down. Part of my preference may be shiny stuff with A304 more prone to surface pitting.

On nuclear plants we had problems with Inter Granular Corrosion Stress Cracking :roll: . Which is chloride corrosion slightly internal to the metal. It effectively pries the metal apart. But, this was a very high temperature and pressure environment.

I am on the very edge of my experience and knowledge. There are no guarantees or warranties implied.

Bill

_________________
Mini -Tug, KH Tahoe 19 & Bartender 24 - There can be no miracle recoveries without first screwing up.
Tahoe 19 Build


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:45 pm
Posts: 336
Location: Thumbpit,Michigan
Bill

Where does 316L fit into the picture? :)

Carl

_________________
Carl
If not now......When?
http://s270.photobucket.com/albums/jj94/gashog7/boat/
http://www.epoxyworks.com/26/index.html Number26


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:45 am
Posts: 5995
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA
Carl,

A316L is low something (magnesiun,...,...,...). Hell, I don't remember. It is actually a little better in a chloride environment than A316.

But, I'm not supposed to know any of this stuff.

Bill

_________________
Mini -Tug, KH Tahoe 19 & Bartender 24 - There can be no miracle recoveries without first screwing up.
Tahoe 19 Build


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:40 pm
Posts: 777
Location: Chelsea, Quebec, Canada
Somebody out there probably needs a link right about now :wink:

I'll offer up a link to Mark Bronkalla's article in WebLetter 32 :

Stainless steel fasteners

More links at the end of his article . . .
__________________
Paul Kane Chelsea, PQ

Building the Glen-L Hot Rod : http://www.boats.chelseacoachworks.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:58 am
Posts: 406
Location: toronto, CAN
What about brass?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group